Rumsfeld Told Truth

This is a photo of a "real" plane crash when a C130 Transport struck a restaurant in Evansville, Ind, l992. Notice pieces of the wreck are all "stacked" against the building. None appear to have penetrated or bounced backward. This was a REAL plane crash. Pentagon photos show no wreckage. It's improbable that an "aluminum-skin" commercial craft could penetrate 100 feet inside a "missile-hardened" bunker called the Pentagon, yet a "titanium winged" with "depleted uranium reinforced fueslage" bounces off a "Jo Jo's Restaurant" in Evansville like a superball.  Like Rumsfeld said.."it was a missile".I don't know if you realize it, but if you want to know precisely when the Pentagon, the US State Dept and the White House knew when the "craft" was going to strike the Pentagon...just work backward from 9/11/01.You see, old crazy zorro believes that the US government either planned 9/11 or got reliable information nearly 5 years before the attack and the "played along" with the planners and financiers to make it look like we weren't aware.Then again, the "play along" scenario is impossible because anyone sophisticated enough to plan the 9/11 "missile strikes" which entailed "placing moles" inside the FAA or "remotely gaming" the FAA radar software and FAA "Flight Number" assignment process from servers outside the US (Germany)...would surely have known that the Pentagon had been conducting "War Games" against craft striking the WTC as early as l995-96.Simply stated, the Planners of 9/11 would have known we were on to them.  That means the annual combined "War Game" was just a "bluff" to dissuade them from attacking.  We were trying to make them think, we were so prepared their plan couldn't succeed.The problem is, the 9/11 planners were able to anticipate the group would take "counter-counter" actions to all of our "counter-insurgency" plans to disable our "planned response" for 9/11.  I can't name names, but it's clear the "existence of counter-counter planning" was certainly made known to extremely high level  operatives inside the US Govt...perhaps through the "Counsiliar Personnel".As a result, the "counter-planning" for 9/11 of 2001 can be traced back in time through the Pentagon Contract's Office and records of the US Army Corps of Engineers.  For a variety of reasons, the necessary documents are unlikely to become available from the US ACE..why?Because "US ACE" was not tasked to bid or complete the Pentagon "hardening".  The British equivalent of the US ACE, ie..British Engineering Corps were assigned the task. Why?As I've suspected for many years, the US ACE has been "hijacked" by foreign forces and interests who could not be trusted to effectively retrofit OR the Limey's just make better engineers OR..the "planning" required British involvement in an attempt to keep all documentation pertaining to the Ways & Means OUT of THE US..and away from the FOIA access.Simply stated, the British Government is NOT required to respond to Freedom of Information Act Requests originating from the United States.  So what?It means that we can't get a true assessment of the exact nature of the "Tasks" assigned to the British.  However, it appears that the contract was first "proposed" on _________,11th of 1995. The contract was awarded on ____________30th, l997 and Construction was begun on the "Blank day of Blank,  The name of the company was AMEC.  It also provided or subcontracted for virtually ALL of the Clean Up Services for the WTC site.  How freaking convenient!  Of course, if  you're  a nut like me and are convinced the British were partially responsible for 9/11 then it makes perfect sense they would "clean" and "cover" the mess they caused.  The knew exactly what to look for and what to hide, right down to the Chinese made blasting caps. (oops, did I say that?)ww.amec.com/news/mediareleasedetails.asp?Pageid=876&MediaID=686&mryear=2002 The Name Of the Project to Repair the Pentagon was "The Phoenix Project".