DARPA

Was the op run from Building Seven?

Of course, this is just the latest brainchild of the monster agency from another planet known as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.  From remote control aviation to the human-machine interface, this entity continuously seeks more and more efficient means of retaining some control over what is left of a soldier's autonomy.  This is the purpose of technology, of course, at least according to the technocracy; corner the market on decision making in the field, be that field economic or military or, as in the case of fascist states, both.

The Bush administration is launching a new government agency that will rely heavily on private security contractors to conduct surveillance in the U.S.  Click here for more at my other blog.

The following is snipped from Government plans to use Flight 93 cockpit tapes in Moussaoui trial: "An official for NetJets, a company that sells shares in private business aircraft, confirmed that the plane tracking Flight 93 belonged to the company. The official, who asked not to be identified by name, said the company was asked not to comment on the Sept. 11 flight but would not say who made the request."

In 1999, I would embark on a campaign (Jam Echelon Day) to publicize the existence of global system of surveillance (ECHELON) implemented by the National Security Agency that "listened" for signs of dissent and threat to the United States and its corporate infrastructure.

Indira Singh: "Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9/11. Their specific job is to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the case of an emergency...

As usual, when anyone jumps onto the remote piloting "theory" they miss one very major point: that Israel and Saudi Arabia have, for some time now, worked very closely with each other in fields related to satellite technologies.

You have been lied to by people that are experts at lying, some of them decorated 9/11 researchers. NO ONE is immune to manipulation. I merely was in a good position at the time of the attacks to notice a few things that others weren't. I hope you will consider my research. I am willing to answer any questions you might have.

The National Reconaissance Office, Mitre Corporation, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, and Booz, Allen, & Hamilton

When I wrote this piece (10-06-06) I was under some false impressions, namely that the particular research on September 11, 2001 that I initiated had sat unexplored during my two year absence from the internet. It turns out it hasn't and even some that ridiculed my research at the time have picked up this particular ball and run with it. That said for the purpose of context, I hope you find this enlightening.

Former national security advisor to Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, in 1970: "Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised…Technology of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm."

Snip: "The military and scientific leaders chartering neuroweapons research will argue that the United States is a uniquely noble country that can be trusted with such technologies, while other countries (except for a few allies) cannot. They will also argue that these technologies will save lives and that U.S. ingenuity will enable the United States to dominate other countries in a neuroweapons race."

The militarization of neuroscience
By Hugh Gusterson
| 10 April 2007

I thought I'd highlight the awesome publication entitled Secrecy News. Kept track of here are the latest developments in intelligence and defense activities, from the newest budget adjustments to papers issued by shadowy groups like the JASON Group. I consider it a vital tool for keeping up on the ball. Here are some great snips you might have missed, were it not for Steve Aftergood, from the past three months:

JOINT CHIEFS ISSUE DOCTRINE ON "HOMELAND DEFENSE"

"Because of the cloak of secrecy thrown over the intelligence budgets, there is no way for the American public, or even much of Congress, to know how those contractors are getting the money, what they are doing with it, or how effectively they are using it.

So you think you've heard it all on 9/11, eh? I sincerely doubt it unless you are familiar with the research of a handful of people whose discoveries were so unnerving to the establishment that it sicked some of its biggest 9/11 gatekeepers on them, gatekeepers that are, themselves, erroneously thought of as being legitimate journalists and by that I mean thought of as legitimate by the resistance. Hey, we can all be fooled.